[Development] QStringLiteral vs QLatin1String , foreach vs for range

[Gunnar Roth]

Hi, thanks for answering, but

> Am 17.01.2016 um 20:36 schrieb Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
> 
> On Sunday 17 January 2016 19:13:44 Gunnar Roth wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I saw quite some changes like https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/145961/
>> <https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/145961/>  Replace QStringLiteral
>> with QLatin1String in QFileSelector. I also read about the problem of
>> QStringLiteral concerning plugins, but what is the idea behind these
>> changes ?
> 
> QLatin1String is more efficient if you're calling a method that has a 
> QLatin1String overload, like most methods in QString itself.
> 
why is QLatin1String more efficient than QLiteralString in this case? both strings  being uft16 seems to be faster for, you could use size_t chunks for comparison for example.

Regards,
Gunnar


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160117/85175372/attachment.html>