[Development] Question about QCoreApplicationData::*_libpaths

Giuseppe D'Angelo dangelog at gmail.com
Tue Jan 19 14:33:46 CET 2016

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> wrote:

> I'd aggregate the std container instead of inheriting it, but yes, that's a
> good idea. I just wrote a mail suggesting essentially the same, only
> slower.
> But I'd have nothing against going all-in, either.

We can't "suddenly" break CoW, though. Who's going to review the millions
of lines of code where copies where happily taken assuming they were cheap?

My 2 c,
Giuseppe D'Angelo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160119/bebc676a/attachment.html>

More information about the Development mailing list