[Development] Question about QCoreApplicationData::*_libpaths
Marc Mutz
marc.mutz at kdab.com
Fri Jan 22 11:00:28 CET 2016
On Friday 22 January 2016 09:43:17 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> Why? In case of QMap, we have no need to use operator= to change the map.
> We simply detach and insert new data in it.
> Of course, in case of multiple changes, the map can reach some "invalid
> state" before changes are finished (i.e. in case we need transacted
> changes, we have to use mutex anyway). But it is not neccessary in some
> cases.
class IWantToBeThreadSafe {
int m_i;
public:
void setI(int i) { m_i = i; }
int i() const { m_i; }
};
Make this class thead-safe (without QAtomicInt :).
Then replace 'int' with QMap.
Then you have your answer.
--
Marc Mutz <marc.mutz at kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
More information about the Development
mailing list