[Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code
Martin Smith
Martin.Smith at qt.io
Thu Jul 7 09:25:18 CEST 2016
How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms.
martin
________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of André Somers <andre at familiesomers.nl>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 9:20:10 AM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code
Op 07/07/2016 om 09:10 schreef Marc Mutz:
> On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations,
>> I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change.
> We have The Chief on record saying that we should use whatever is most efficient
> internally (https://codereview.qt-project.org/114327 comment from
> 2015-06-15), and you agreeing (ibid, 1st @ 2015-06-16).
>
> So from my pov, the only question is whether we stay with Option 4 or relax to
> Option 5, and I'm fine with either.
>
I don't think that rules out option 3 either, does it?
André
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160707/2a82077f/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list