[Development] [FYI] commit/review policy refactored

[Martin Smith]

Sometimes I am listed as a reviewer for a code change in Qt that also involves documentation changes. The code change is sometimes outside my expertise, but I assume I have been included to approve the documentation changes. I always give +1 in such cases. Is that correct?


martin

________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen at qt.io>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:08:07 AM
To: development at qt-project.org; qt-creator at qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] [FYI] commit/review policy refactored

just a heads-up that i (finally) split off the review policy from the
commit policy. see https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy .
if you have suggestions for improvement, please discuss them upfront on
irc.

you're expected to read the document even if you're not interested in
actively improving it any time soon. ;)

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160713/736f0f59/attachment.html>