[Development] Source break policy for function overloads

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Wed Jul 13 16:16:39 CEST 2016

Il 13/07/2016 15:55, Simon Hausmann ha scritto:
> I think if we allow source compatibility breakages like the one here
> (overloaded slot added), then I think
> it should require a prominent notice in the changelog / release notes.

Note that setInterval is not even a slot (but an overload of start(), a 
slot, was also added in the same commit). Do we need to add changelog 
notes for *any* overload added to free functions or QObject subclass 
member functions?

Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908
KDAB - The Qt Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4007 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160713/95fd44bb/attachment.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list