[Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback
Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de
Mon Jun 27 11:28:50 CEST 2016
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +0000, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> We have mostly stopped working on QtQuick Controls 1, because the
> implementation of Controls 2 is much more performant ...
Controls 2 are for "embedded" - what at least means to me: not being for
> It was achieved by implementing behavior in C++ ...
... and by dropping desktop specific features.
But does your statement imply, that Qt development has mostly given up QML
as a technology for the desktop ?
If true, was it done because of:
a) seeing Controls 1 as complete and satisfying
b) something is wrong with the implementation of Controls 1
c) the overhead of QML is too big for such large projects
d) nobody is interested in the desktop at all
And what is recommended for us users: better starting off with widgets
for new desktop applications ?
More information about the Development