[Development] INTEGRITY changes for 5.7

[Rolland Dudemaine]

Ideally i'd like to get those also in 5.7 indeed.

For 5.8/dev, there is no need for asking for an exception i guess, just following the regular merge procedure would do just fine.

--Rolland

From: Liang Qi <cavendish.qi at gmail.com>
Sent: Mar 2, 2016 08:28
To: Rolland Dudemaine
Cc: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] INTEGRITY changes for 5.7

Do you plan to have them in 5.7 release? Current dev branch means 5.8...

On 2 March 2016 at 08:24, Rolland Dudemaine <rolland at ghs.com<mailto:rolland at ghs.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
ago already but never got merged (partially because of the CI woes).

This would cover all the patches with a positive code review status at
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:rolland%2540ghs.com+status:open,n,z

Thanks,
Best regards,

--
----------------------------------------------------------
Rolland Dudemaine               tel direct:+33 143 143 702<tel:%2B33%20143%20143%20702>
Green Hills Software                   tel:+33 143 143 700<tel:%2B33%20143%20143%20700>
4 rue de la Pierre Levee            mailto:rolland at ghs.com<mailto:rolland at ghs.com>
75011 Paris                           fax: +33 143 143 707<tel:%2B33%20143%20143%20707>
France                             web: http://www.ghs.com
----------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development



--
http://www.qiliang.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160302/03e94d51/attachment.html>