[Development] templated QObjects [was: Re: We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++]
milian.wolff at kdab.com
Wed Mar 2 20:59:41 CET 2016
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 11:28:07 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 19:24:15 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 09:47:33 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 16:48:08 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > > A simple solution would then be a macro for an explicit instantiation,
> > > > similar to what we already do with
> > > > Q_DECLARE_LOGGING_CATEGORY/Q_LOGGING_CATEGORY. Only there then would
> > > > moc
> > > > generate the static meta object. That should work, no?
> > >
> > > That is the case I mentioned before: the template class's author needs
> > > to
> > > know each and every possible instantiation ahead of time and instantiate
> > > them. Unlikely to be acceptable use-case.
> > For the use-case I have in mind, i.e. templated models, it would just
> > fine.
> > Note that I did not propose to have the macro for the instantiation where
> > the template gets defined. Rather, I imagine users of the template to do
> > that on demand.
> That's not the case above. I was talking about pre-populating every possible
> If the users do it on demand, then we have the runtime merging problem on
> Pick your poison.
what is "the runtime merging problem on Windows"?
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff at kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
KDAB - The Qt Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5903 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Development