[Development] Move assignment without move constructors

[Thiago Macieira]

On segunda-feira, 23 de maio de 2016 18:25:14 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > Is there any good reason for these classes to not have move constructor,
> > or is it just an unfortunate omission?
> Because the implementation of a move constructor for those classes 
> requires the private class to be defined in the public header, but all 
> those classes are pimpl'd, so by definition you don't have that private 
> class available.

We couldn't implement them before Qt 5.7, but we can now.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center