[Development] Basing Qt Creator Coding Style on C++ Core Guidelines?

[Konstantin Tokarev]

18.11.2016, 01:03, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
> On quinta-feira, 17 de novembro de 2016 11:35:54 PST Marc Mutz wrote:
>>  The bigger problem is that while owner<T> does not affect the ABI, all other
>>  GSL types do, and we're back to our §$%&!§ rule that we can't accept other
>>  libs' types in our ABI, preventing anything other than owner<T> from being
>>  added to Qt.
>
> We can't accept the Standard Library ABI in our ABI as per previous decisions
> (that I guess will be revisited once we get the QUIP on it up).
>
> But GSL is another story. If it is sensibly developed, with a promise to
> binary compatibility for extended periods of time and no nonsense stuff like
> inline namespaces, we could accept it. Especially the header-only parts of it.
>
> As for whether we can accept in our *API*, that depends on whether we would
> force our users to learn something alien to Qt or it, and what the benefits
> would be. Similar to the "empty()" function case.
>
> PS: IMO, the name of the library is inconvenient. It's too close to GLSL and
> GST (GStreamer). Of course, not a reason not to use it.

"GSL" was standing for GNU Scientific Library for a long time.

>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin