[Development] Basing Qt Creator Coding Style on C++ Core Guidelines?

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezmeyer at gmail.com
Tue Nov 22 18:35:40 CET 2016


On lunes, 21 de noviembre de 2016 23:18:08 ART Marco Bubke wrote:
[snip]
> I strongly agree with Andre'. And is a BC break in the time of flat pack
> that bad? As an user I really looking forward to flat pack,  so I can
> update my heavily used Applications and being not dependent on
> distribution.

Well, what about all the rest of applications? Your heavily used apps (and 
*libs*, don't forget them) are not necessarily other user's.

For what it's worth you can see in [qtbase.txt] a list of packages that would 
get removed from Debian if we where to remove qtbase right now. In other 
words, the list of apps and libs that would be affected by an ABI breackage.

You can also think on the amount of flatpacks you would need to make.

[qtbase.txt] <http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ben/qtbase.txt>

-- 
lo cual parece incompatible.
lógica, esa tendrá particiones dentro,
si se transforma la extendida a
tiene particiones lógicas, luego
extendida. Una extendida
estar dentro de una partición
Una partición lógica necesita

Diga NO al topposting.

  Matias Silva Bustos

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20161122/995ade9b/attachment.sig>


More information about the Development mailing list