[Development] Qt 5.9

[Lars Knoll]

I'm fine with this one as well, but as Thiago said in that case it would be good if we could provide 64bit MingW for 5.8 (maybe 5.8.1) to give people a little more time to migrate.

Cheers,
Lars

On 23/11/16 08:59, "Development on behalf of Alexander Blasche" <development-bounces+lars.knoll=qt.io at qt-project.org on behalf of alexander.blasche at qt.io> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
    > From: Development [mailto:development-
    > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt.io at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Alexander
    > Blasche
     
    > I don't think we can drop all 32bit support. I do believe MSVC 2017 should be
    > part of the deal though. That's a good suggestion. Keeping these two options in
    > mind, I suggest to drop MSVC 2013 32 bit against MSVC 2017 64bit. This keeps
    > the number of packages the same.
    
    To make it more obvious here is my suggestion:
    
    5.9:
                     	32-bit      64-bit
    MSVC 2013          N           Y
    MSVC 2015          Y           Y
    MSVC 2017          N           Y
    MinGW                 N           Y
    
    --
    [Alexander Blasche] Alex
    _______________________________________________
    Development mailing list
    Development at qt-project.org
    http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development