[Development] Multiple Qt branches on Coverity Scan

[Thiago Macieira]

On segunda-feira, 3 de outubro de 2016 22:42:23 CEST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> I'd say we should at least get 5.6 and dev covered (we can then bikeshed
> on the naming -- "stable" and "dev"?). What do you think?

Please do. That's a good idea, even if we don't have a lot of people looking 
at those results, any help is good.

I think the names should be "5.6" or "lts", the other one stays named as it 
is.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center