[Development] Multiple Qt branches on Coverity Scan

[Samuel Gaist]

> On 3 oct. 2016, at 23:09, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On segunda-feira, 3 de outubro de 2016 22:42:23 CEST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> I'd say we should at least get 5.6 and dev covered (we can then bikeshed
>> on the naming -- "stable" and "dev"?). What do you think?
> 
> Please do. That's a good idea, even if we don't have a lot of people looking
> at those results, any help is good.
> 
> I think the names should be "5.6" or "lts", the other one stays named as it
> is.
> 
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Hi,

I’d go for LTS, this way it’s clearer why it’s covered and doesn’t need to be changed in the future.

Samuel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20161003/6876fcce/attachment.sig>