[Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016
Laszlo Agocs
laszlo.agocs at qt.io
Tue Sep 6 16:00:55 CEST 2016
Using one "bin" is the default behavior, yes, but one can pass -hostprefix to separate them upon install.
http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.8/embedded-linux.html#configuring-a-specific-device
Cheers,
Laszlo
________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:49 PM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016
Em terça-feira, 6 de setembro de 2016, às 06:20:34 PDT, Thiago Macieira
escreveu:
> Building the host tools while cross-compiling is a convenience and I think
> we can keep it, but I don't think we should simply have different "bin"
> dirs.
Fail in sentence rewrite. I wanted to write "don't think we should mix" and
then rewrote to "think we should simply have different 'bin' dirs" -- except I
forgot to remove the "don't".
I don't have a cross-compiled build of Qt handy, but I think we put both host
and target builds in the same "bin" dir during the build. It should be easy to
split and then always build target tools too.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160906/aaedfa00/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list