[Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016
Stephen Kelly
stephen.kelly at ableton.com
Thu Sep 15 14:39:54 CEST 2016
On 15/09/16 08:57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Stephen Kelly via Development wrote:
>> I want to understand Qbs and what it can do with a dynamic build graph
>> which CMake can't do.
>>
> there is no such thing
Oh, I'm very surprised by that.
That also means I don't understand the great advantage of Qbs, just when
I thought I was starting to understand it.
My previous guess about Qbs being able to generate unknown files in a
particular location and then determine them by an 'ls' equivalent, moc
them and compile everything is not something Qbs would be able to do.
> so what it all comes down to is that qbs is, as in pretty much every
> other regard, simply more elegant than cmake
Ok, thanks for clarifying!
I'm still interested in a Qbs solution to the code/repo I posted before.
A full and preferably working Qbs solution, instead of a snippet, would
be good for comparison.
Thanks,
--
Ableton AG, Schoenhauser Allee 6-7, 10119 Berlin, Germany
Management Board: Gerhard Behles, Jan Bohl
Chair of the Supervisory Board: Uwe Struck
Registered Office: Berlin, Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 72838
More information about the Development
mailing list