[Development] QDataStream: blackbox or document all versions?
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Sun Sep 25 05:58:38 CEST 2016
A thread on the interest mailing list started when someone asked for the
docs for the current format of the QDataStream wire protocol, to which I
replied that it doesn't exist as we don't maintain such docs.
Long story short, we have two options:
Option 1: claim QDataStream is a blackbox and tell people that the only thing
that can read QDataStream is QDataStream. That means removing the
documentation file src/corelib/doc/src/datastreamformat.qdoc, as we don't want
people getting any ideas that they could write their own decoders or encoders.
Option 2: the opposite, saying that reading QDataStream's output is fine from
non-Qt code and it's fine to write data that QDataStream should read. This
means extending the documentation to cover ALL 17 wire formats (including
bugs) and keeping it up to date whenever someone modifies the format.
I am in favour of Option 1 because I really don't think QDataStream is a good
format for exchanging data with non-Qt code. It's designed first and foremost
for Qt's own internal data formats (sometimes even depending on internal
details), the marshalling of certain types in certain versions is buggy and
lossy. Instead, people should find a better transport format for their data, of
which we already have in Qt:
QSettings (to an extent)
And I can add CBOR support if we want to.
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development