[Development] Adding Q_GADGET here and there

Alberto Mardegan mardy at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Apr 17 17:50:32 CEST 2017

On 16/04/2017 21:13, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Q_GADGET's overhead is basically the cost of the QMetaObject. So it's there, 
> but it's quite small.
> If there is an use for a class to be a Q_GADGET, I think it should be added.

For the record:


More information about the Development mailing list