[Development] [docs] changing the way overloads are documented and presented

André Somers andre at familiesomers.nl
Fri Apr 28 17:01:21 CEST 2017

Op 28/04/2017 om 15:48 schreef Martin Smith:
>> I am a bit worried about having a good way to describe the specifics of a >specific overload or group thereof.
> Remember you will still have the option of giving an overload its own qdoc comment instead of including it in the common \fn comment.
True, but that would negate some of the benefits: having a good overview
of the different overloads all together as well as sharing the common
documentation between the overloads.


More information about the Development mailing list