[Development] Request moving project to playground area

[Jesus Fernandez]

On Saturday, February 04, 2017 07:05:41 AM Hamed Masafi wrote:
> Why not using Q_PROPERTY instead of NUT_DECLARE_FIELD?
> 
> A property im table is more thsn a just Qt property, that macro create
> property and static field for query writing and class info about property
> to add to database.

To achieve this I think it's possible to use the property system + a custom subclass of QObject. If you want to expose this objects to QML you will need to declare a Q_PROPERTY, so It's not convenient.

> 
> And what's the reason to have a constructor as Q_INVOKABLE?
> 
> Andre right about that,

If you register the class as "MetaType" you will be able to create instances of the class using QMetaType::create().

> 
> Actually, there are more ORM solutions for Qt, e.g. QxOrm and QDjango
> 
> Yes, there are, either other languages/frameworks like .net and java has.
> But I really live Qt so I think it can be a good idea if prepare free one
> of them to integrate into Qt.
> 
> I think Nut is easy to use and feature rich (in alpha state for now) that
> support much database manager.
> 
> Some of them are complicated and some others are so simple to real using.
> We can provide a full feature module with LGPL to community use.
> 
> Excuses for my bad English, but I want give that tool to Qt community that
> very helped me. I want suggest two of my libraries to playground area.
> 
> After all of this, can I know your idea about an orm in playground area?

-- 

Best regards,
Jesus