[Development] __has_include vs GCC
Stephen Kelly
steveire at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 00:52:03 CET 2017
Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
> complaining that __has_include returns true for headers which then, when
> included, #error out about the wrong C++ standard used.
In my opinion, the problem is sd-6 defining feature macros in the header
that contains the implementation, instead of in a single header.
There are many reasons not to do that, but the opinion of the chair is
bonkers and no one else has an opinion:
https://www.mail-archive.com/features@isocpp.open-std.org/msg00018.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/features@isocpp.open-std.org/msg00162.html
Thanks,
Steve.
More information about the Development
mailing list