[Development] Proposal for "container-oriented deterministic memory manager"

Phil Bouchard philippeb8 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 7 02:05:06 CET 2017


On 01/06/2017 07:17 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>
> Just to conclude I did try the attached benchmark and I get the
> following on a x86_64 @ 2.40 GHz:
>
> 0: 61331143.40263957 allocations / second
> 1: 63644162.93924019 allocations / second
> 2: 177628727.5388474 allocations / second
> 3: 179850939.5413082 allocations / second
> 1 / 0: 103.7713621632905% boost
> 2 / 1: 101.2510431354494% boost
>
> So the fast_pool_allocator is already pretty fast and I can only get a
> 1% speed boost by allocating big memory blocks.  So it doesn't look like
> there is any way to make the fast_pool_allocator any faster.

Correction: I get a 11% speed boost with the -O3 flag:

0: 60387275.67636769 allocations / second
1: 63133704.55951615 allocations / second
2: 169169529.8609596 allocations / second
3: 188535531.4062488 allocations / second
1 / 0: 104.5480258090584% boost
2 / 1: 111.447688931456% boost

So I am not sure if this is worth the trouble.




More information about the Development mailing list