[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

[Jake Petroules]

Regardless, he has a point: in more diplomatic terms, this thread and those preceding it are not promoting useful discourse, so I'd encourage others to refrain from posting further replies, and let this thread die out.

Sent from my iPhone - the most secure mobile device - via the Verizon network
--
Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at qt.io<mailto:jake.petroules at qt.io>
The Qt Company - Silicon Valley
Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io<http://qbs.io>
_____________________________
From: James McDonnell <jmcdonnell at blackberry.com<mailto:jmcdonnell at blackberry.com>>
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS
To: Oleg Khotskin <o.khotskin at gmail.com<mailto:o.khotskin at gmail.com>>, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com<mailto:philippeb8 at gmail.com>>
Cc: development <development at qt-project.org<mailto:development at qt-project.org>>


That's the sort of comment that drives new people away from open source projects. Please refrain from making such comments.

Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers Network
From: o.khotskin at gmail.com<mailto:o.khotskin at gmail.com>
Sent: July 22, 2017 2:06 PM
To: philippeb8 at gmail.com<mailto:philippeb8 at gmail.com>
Cc: development at qt-project.org<mailto:development at qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS


Does anyone take this dumbass seriously?

--
Best regards,
Oleg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170722/3743f612/attachment.html>