[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS
Phil Bouchard
philippeb8 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 24 02:28:09 CEST 2017
On 07/23/2017 07:12 PM, Henry Skoglund wrote:
> On 2017-07-24 00:13, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> On 07/23/2017 03:54 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 23 July 2017 12:27:44 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
> ..
> ..
> ..
>>> How does your tool deal with runtime code generation via eval() ?
>>
>> First you need to ask yourself if that function is really used a lot
>> because I never used it but if it is then you'll have to use it like a
>> C printf to pass the parameters, embed a compiler and compile it
>> on-demand.
>>
>
> But what about Qt.include? I'm helping in on a QML project that reloads
> QML code from db using Qt.include. They won't like having to ship
> different c++ compilers for their different runtimes :-(
It's impossible to get rid of Javascript entirely if you want backward
compatibility unfortunately so you include both the BB++ converter, the
C++ compiler for new apps and Javascript interpreter to maintain old apps.
More information about the Development
mailing list