[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

[Phil Bouchard]

On 07/26/2017 09:15 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 08:11 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
>>
>> I didn't have a chance to create documentation yesterday but I will this
>> week.
>
> I just created a more complex example and it seems to be running
> perfectly fine:
>
> class Document
> {
>     auto head = nullptr<Document>();
>     auto tail = nullptr<Document>();
>
>     Document() { cout << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << endl; }
>     ~Document() { cout << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << endl; }
>
>     auto foo = function (int argument) { cout << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ <<
> endl; return argument; };
> };
>
> int main()
> {
>     auto temporary = 1;
>
>     auto document = new Document();
>     document.foo(temporary);
>
>     auto bar = function ()
>     {
>         auto document = new Document();
>
>         // cycle
>         document.head = new Document();
>         document.head.head = new Document();
>         document.head.head.head = document;
>
>         return document;
>     };
>
>     cout << 1 << endl;
>     auto result = bar().foo(temporary);
>     cout << 2 << endl;
> }
>
>
> Outputs:
>
> Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
> auto __lambda0(boost::node_proxy&, int)
> 1
> Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
> Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
> Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
> Document::~Document()
> Document::~Document()
> auto __lambda0(boost::node_proxy&, int)
> 2
> Document::~Document()
> Document::~Document()

Sorry I just fixed the last bug there can be and now the output 
correctly shows the following:

Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
auto __lambda0(boost::node_proxy&, int)
1
Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
Document::Document(const boost::node_proxy&)
auto __lambda0(boost::node_proxy&, int)
2
Document::~Document()
Document::~Document()
Document::~Document()
Document::~Document()

This is because all the elements in a certain "branch" get upscaled to a 
higher scope and therefore will all get deleted in that specific scope.


Thanks,
-Phil