[Development] What to do with qrand/qsrand?

[Olivier Goffart]

Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2017, 21:52:34 CEST schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> I've changed almost all uses of qrand in Qt sources to QRandomGenerator and
> eliminated the use of qsrand. That is actually the biggest advantage: not
> needing to seed the generator. I was quite surprised how much use of qrand
> we have in our own source code, and not just in examples. (See commits with
> Change-Id Icd0e0d4b27cb4e5eb892fffd14b5285d43f4afbf).
> 
> Obviously those functions need to remain in Qt 5, but what should we do to
> them long-term? See
> 	https://lxr.kde.org/ident?_i=qrand&_remember=1
> 
> With this many references, I'm not sure we should even add a QT_DEPRECATED
> warning to it, since that would make trigger-happy "warning--" developers in
> KDE wholesale moving to something else.

Can you elaborate? Why would that be a bad thing?
 
> Options:
>  1) do nothing, leave as-is (in Qt 6, use thread_local)
> 
>  2) deprecate and provide no replacement. That is, tell people to either:
>    - use QRandomGenerator if they need true random, non-bulk
>    - use <random> engines if they need bulk
>    - use <stdlib.h> rand() if they need C library compatibility
> 
>  3) deprecate and provide a thread-safe PRNG, which can be used in bulk
>     a) with no seed; or
>     b) with an access to seeding
> 
>  4) same as #3, but actually use the qrand/qsrand names
>    for (a), qsrand would be empty