[Development] QtWebKit is coming back (part 2)

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu May 4 16:17:09 CEST 2017

Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:51:45 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev 
> I'm leaning towards "6.0.0" number, because it's larger than any 5.x and
> makes it clear that versioning is different now. Bug fixes will increment
> patch version (6.0.x), WebKit updates minor version (6.1.x etc), API/ABI
> breaking changes - major verison (7.0 etc.)

I thought you weren't breaking either source or binary compatibility. So using 
a new major number sounds wrong.

And what would you do when Qt 6 gets released in a couple of years?

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

More information about the Development mailing list