[Development] QUIP 6: removing top-level const from return types
Giuseppe D'Angelo
dangelog at gmail.com
Wed May 24 00:35:50 CEST 2017
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Thiago Macieira
<thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>
> We are arguing whether the change makes the code uglier and is worth that
> ugliness. I'm not sold on that. Leave those const behind until Qt 6, unless
> you can show that engaging the move constructor is important.
What about defining a (private) macro centrally and using it in those
places, as it has been proposed?
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
More information about the Development
mailing list