[Development] Speeding up the review process (was: PostgreSQL cross compile for Pi)
Viktor Engelmann
viktor.engelmann at qt.io
Fri Oct 13 15:48:51 CEST 2017
I am thinking about the scenario when I read a 300 line commit and I am
unsure about some of the lines. Say it removes one include and adds
another include.
If that commit comes from someone whom I talk to every day - someone
whom I know to be very concerned about security and privacy - and
someone I know is competent and has approver rights - I might ignore
these 2 lines and assume that the compiler will fail on the CI in case
the removed header was still needed.
When the commit comes from someone whom I have never heard of - I will
look into whether there is a symbol that will now be resolved
differently - and if there is, I assume that this "differently" opens a
backdoor.
On 13.10.2017 14:52, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On 2017-10-13 13:04, Viktor Engelmann wrote:
>> * I don't think we need to be as paranoid towards contributions
>> from
>> our own employees as we need to be towards external contributions.
>
> I believe you got that the wrong way around :)
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
>
--
Viktor Engelmann
Software Engineer
The Qt Company GmbH
Rudower Chaussee 13
D-12489 Berlin
Viktor.Engelmann at qt.io
+49 151 26784521
http://qt.io
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi,
Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin,
Registergericht: Amtsgericht
Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
The Future is Written with Qt
www.qtworldsummit.com
More information about the Development
mailing list