[Development] Fwd: Re: Bug#874054: Setting QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a huge negative performance impact, should not be always on

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezmeyer at gmail.com
Tue Sep 5 14:16:23 CEST 2017


---------- Mensaje reenviado ----------
De: "Samuel Thibault" <sthibault at debian.org>
Fecha: 3 sep. 2017 4:39 p.m.
Asunto: Re: Bug#874054: Setting QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON=1 has a
huge negative performance impact, should not be always on
Para: "Allan Sandfeld Jensen" <kde at carewolf.com>, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer" <lisandro at debian.org>, "Sebastian Humenda" <shumenda at gmx.de>,
"Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" <perezmeyer at gmail.com>, "Alex ARNAUD"
<alexarnaud at hypra.fr>, <874054 at bugs.debian.org>, <
debian-qt-kde at lists.debian.org>, <development at qt-project.org>
Cc:

Samuel Thibault, on dim. 03 sept. 2017 21:17:12 +0200, wrote:
> I have checked with a vanilla reinstall of Debian 9, using the Mate
> desktop, and Qt 5.7.1.
>
> When QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON is not set, I don't see Qt
> applications in accerciser, only the Mate applications. If I set
> QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON, I do see them.
>
> On my current desktop, I have Qt 5.9.1, I made quick tests, it seems
> it behaves as I expect, so perhaps we can indeed avoid setting
> QT_LINUX_ACCESSIBILITY_ALWAYS_ON now. I'll retest with a vanilla
> reinstall of debian testing, to be sure.

Yes, a vanilla reinstall behaves as expected.  So we can drop that
variable, good :)

Samuel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170905/728746a9/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list