[Development] Raising the minimum Core Language to C++14 for Linux/XCB
Gatis.Paeglis at qt.io
Sun Jul 15 12:17:52 CEST 2018
> There has been no reply on this subject. Shall I assume silence is consent and
> we can begin using C++14 constructs in the XCB plugin?
I think I know which patch you are talking about and then my answer is we can't. The code that you
are looking at I want to eventually move in some common place (out of XCB) as part of .
From: Development <development-bounces+gatis.paeglis=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 4:23:01 PM
To: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Core Language to C++14 for Linux/XCB
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 12:53:14 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Mac, we kinda already require that. I'm asking to raise the minimum for
> the regular Linux builds to C++14. Specifically, I'm asking for the "auto"
> functions without trailing return type and relaxed constexpr.
> Currently, our minimum supported GCC version is 4.7 (on QNX only) and 4.8
> elsewhere. That would raise the minimum on Linux to GCC 5, as per:
> That's a 3-year-old compiler, four releases out of date, present in the
> main, binary Linux distros since:
> Ubuntu 15.10 
> Fedora 22 
> Debian 9 (Stretch) 
> openSUSE Leap 15 
> Note that this does not apply to QNX or Android, so C++14 features would not
> be allowed in cross-platform code.
> But we'd be able to use it in the XCB plugin. [Does QNX build that?]
There has been no reply on this subject. Shall I assume silence is consent and
we can begin using C++14 constructs in the XCB plugin?
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Development