[Development] Qt for WebAssembly

[Lorn Potter]

On 03/12/2018 11:42 PM, Jason H wrote:
> 1. True ActiveX was extremely limiting, NaCL less so, Emscripten/asm.js less so. I can't really argue much difference between WebAssembly and asm.js though, given asm.js's previous performance claims.

In my experience WebAssembly is much more performant than asmjs, wasm
also creates binaries that are at least 10x less huge than asmjs.

> Given the limitations outlined above, and considering the ecosystem
>implications, I am left to conclude that Qt needs to include a proper
>web component.

as they say... patches welcome :)