[Development] Build system for Qt 6

[Bogdan Vatra]

Hi,

Yes, "hard to work with" :).

Cheers,
BogDan.

În ziua de joi, 1 noiembrie 2018, la 11:24:29 EET, Vlad Stelmahovsky a scris:
> you mean "hard to work with"?
> 
> On 11/1/18 9:34 AM, Bogdan Vatra via Development wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >    GN is the closest build system to QBS, the only problem it has it's
> > 
> > controled by Google and these guys are sometime had to work with.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > BogDan.
> > 
> > În ziua de joi, 1 noiembrie 2018, la 10:30:01 EET, Nikolai Kosjar a scris:
> >> On 10/29/18 1:17 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
> >>> Given that we are confident we can build Qt 6 with cmake, I believe that
> >>> it makes most sense to follow down that route.
> >> 
> >> Just some observation:
> >> 
> >> LLVM/Clang is a bigger project using CMake for some longer time and
> >> coincidentally, just now, there is a discussion whether they should add
> >> GN build files to their repositories as, let me quote:
> >> 
> >> """
> >> cmake is great for many use cases, but in my opinion local day-to-day
> >> development isn't one of them.
> >> """
> >> 
> >> Clang: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-October/060006.html
> >> LLVM: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127342.html
> >> 
> >> Nikolai
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Development mailing list
> >> Development at qt-project.org
> >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Development mailing list
> > Development at qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development