[Development] Who is in charge of qt-project.org?

[NIkolai Marchenko]

Yes, but you've still broken the promise made in the earlier blog post of
making qbs a replacement for qmake and build system  for qt.
Also, there's a high chance that with Chrisitan Kandeler moving away, qbs
will just stagnate and die.

This was somethign that was promised to be developed and nurtured by TQtC
itself. This promise was broken.
We no longer trust TQtC with any new technology.

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:15 PM Martin Smith <Martin.Smith at qt.io> wrote:

> >You've just dropped Qbs, what's next?
> >I don't trust you anymore, nor the company-ies you represent - Nothing
> personal.
> >I think that it is time for the qt-project.org domain to be handed
> >back to the Qt Project community.
>
> But "dropped Qbs" means The Qt Company won't be developing Qbs anymore,
> which means, effectively, Qbs is being handed to the Qt Project community.
>
> martin
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt.io at qt-project.org>
> on behalf of Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 1:08:34 PM
> To: Lars Knoll
> Cc: development at qt-project.org; v.ronin at yahoo.it
> Subject: Re: [Development] Who is in charge of qt-project.org?
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 23:55, Lars Knoll <lars.knoll at qt.io> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 22:25, Kain Vampire via Development
> > <development at qt-project.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have to apologise for my behaviour. While I still think Christian
> Gagneraud's attack on the Qt company abilities was unfair and uncalled for,
> it's not a justification for my actions.
> > Creating an hostile environment is bad for the community and I should
> not have done it.
> > It won't happen again,
> > Regards,
> > Luca
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would  like to apologise as well, my sarcasm and my provocation went
> > uncontrolled.
> > My fault, this was definitely not the most clever way to get things
> sorted.
> > I'm looking forward HTTPS://lists.qt-project.org to be back online and
> > would like to thanks everyone working on the matter.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Chris and Luca.
> >
> > Getting lists.qt-project.org fixed is being worked on. I hope it’s
> won’t be too long.
> >
> > But there’s something to take away for TQtC as the party taking care of
> the infrastructure here. TQtC needs to establish some more pro-active
> monitoring of the infrastructure so that these things will get ideally get
> fixed before they become a problem next time. I’ll see what I can do to
> help getting that in place.
>
> <big-warning message="not cool at all" apologies="you have been
> warned, do not keep reading if you do not fell comfortable">
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> You've just dropped Qbs, what's next?
> I don't trust you anymore, nor the company-ies you represent - Nothing
> personal.
> I think that it is time for the qt-project.org domain to be handed
> back to the Qt Project community.
> I was reading a french article this morning
> (https://linuxfr.org/news/fedora-29), i give you an inaccurate, but
> syntactic and compact translation of the article introduction:
>
> Fedora is a GNU/Linux distribution developed by the Fedora Project and
> sponsored by Red Hat that provide them with developers, finance and
> logistics.
> Fedora can be seen as an open source technological show case of Red
> Hat proprietary technology. (NDLR: Free and inaccurate translation, i
> mean it)
> => sold for 34 billions dollars
>
> How do you fell about that? Do you see similarities?
>
> Is the triple-licensed Qt stack an open source technological show case
> of what the Qt Company has to offer?
> </big-warning>
>
> More seriously, yes, Fedora/RedHat  and
> Qt/Project/Company/Digia/Nokia/Microsoft/TrollTech are different beast
> (apple and oranges, yadi, yada, ...).
> But I see similarities. (and i do not care about the 34 billions)
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181102/82860269/attachment.html>