[Development] Qt6 source changes
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sat Nov 3 15:44:34 CET 2018
Olivier Goffart wrote:
> (We should probably deprecate QQueue right now and tell people to use
The API is just not comparable: QQueue uses nicer terminology (enqueue,
dequeue, head) and is implicitly shared, and most importantly, is consistent
with the other Qt containers.
It is only one-sided, but often that's all that's needed. But the two-sided
use case (for which plain QList is currently the best fit, it offers all the
operations std::deque does, with similar wording) must not be destroyed
either (as replacing QList with the current QVector would).
More information about the Development