[Development] Resolving coding style contentions

Marco Bubke Marco.Bubke at qt.io
Wed Nov 21 20:19:01 CET 2018


Some people use clang format already for Qt Creator. My experience so far is very positive. Actually the best part is that there is no time any more spend on formatting, especially for chats about very personal aesthetics.

________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces at lists.qt-project.org> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:11:04 PM
To: Matthew Woehlke
Cc: Thiago Macieira; Qt development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Development] Resolving coding style contentions

On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 19:51, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2018 03.28, Lars Knoll wrote:
> > I suggest that we stop arguing about coding styles by defining one
> > through a tool (aka clang-format and one format file for all of Qt).
>
> Ugh... clang-format is only okay if you want LLVM's code style, and it

It has been used successfully in projects that don't use LLVM's style.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at lists.qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181121/06d4f935/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list