[Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

[Alexey Andreyev]

> If they want to be malicious, they'll find a way.
Opposite extreme is "who cares, let's accept something and sort it out on
the go later"

> Which promises in other CoCs do you find vulnerable?
Talking about CC and KDE's CoC, it's not obvious for me how to perform
politics, religion, race, etc -- harassment protection correctly at
international digital community with provided rules.
I'm not saying we don't need rules. You said KDE's version looks better
comparing to CC. Archlinux version looks even better for me.

Anyway, I'm not a professional at such social tasks and want to step back.
I do not want to look like annoying person, just wanted to help with
controversial subjects.
I have no doubts about Qt people professionalism and happy do be a part of
the community.

пн, 29 окт. 2018 г. в 7:08, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:

> On Sunday, 28 October 2018 17:20:04 PDT Alexey Andreyev wrote:
> > > Sure, but again that's why we have a committee behind who will evaluate
> > the
> > > charges and decide what the proper action to be taken is. If the
> charges
> > are
> > > fake, then the accused would of course not be affected in any way. And
> if
> > the
> > > accuser keeps making false accusations, that's the one who could face
> > > sanctions.
> >
> > Sanctions like ban with additional false accusations about harassment
> could
> > be sent to mass media to create negative image of the community.
>
> And if the mass media does buy into the fake story, what can we do? The
> attacker can seize on any particular point of our community, whether
> there's a
> CoC or not. They could attack us for *not* having one in the first place
> and
> having no method to address their fake injutsice. They could attack us for
> having a security mailing list that judged a particular issue they
> reported
> not to be a security problem, etc.
>
> If they want to be malicious, they'll find a way.
>
> And if the media sides with them, not giving us a chance to explain, what
> are
> we going to do?
>
> > Let's take a look at archlinux CoC for example:
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct
> >
> > Literally no vulnerable promises about protecting from harassment that
> > could be hard to keep. Additional mention at archwiki not to play with
> > controvertial non-related subjects at technical place:
>
> Which promises in other CoCs do you find vulnerable?
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181029/af63aadb/attachment.html>