[Development] Build system for Qt 6
Uwe Rathmann
Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de
Tue Oct 30 11:18:48 CET 2018
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:59:28 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> What Lars said, if I read the email properly, is that the Qt Company
> does not see a business value in developing it further.
Yes and this is relevant if it is relevant for the maintainers of Qbs. Do
we have a statement from them so far ?
> But the project is open source and the code is there and anyone is free
> to take over if they are interested in it.
In case a maintainer decides to step down the normal process would be to
find a new one. Only if this is not possible further steps have to be
taken.
Using Qbs for building Qt has been discussed here and lead to a solid
decision against it. Obviously then the Qt company decided not to work on
this code anymore - so far so good.
But deprecating Qbs as a tool for building user projects is absolutely
not covered by this discussion and if there was a more related one I seem
to have missed it.
This all has a lot to do with the question if the Qt Company sees itself
as being a member or the owner of the Qt project. If we really want to be
a community project, then the process of inventing and deprecating
modules has to become more independent.
Uwe
More information about the Development
mailing list