[Development] Build system for Qt 6

[Иван Комиссаров]

Wow, hold on for a minute.
I’ve been using a qbs package as a standalone leaf package (sudo aptitude install qbs) to build my projects. Also, self-built QBS package was commercially used to create several Debian packages back in 2013.

> 30 окт. 2018 г., в 18:18, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer at gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> El martes, 30 de octubre de 2018 13:52:18 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen escribió:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:10:27AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Is it packaged in a Linux distribution? My requirements also included
>>> continuously packaged for 2 years in at least 3 Linux distributions,
>>> at the time of the Qt switch to the particular buildsystem.
>> 
>> it's been packaged for much longer and by more distros already, because
>> it's part of qt creator for quite a while. i don't know whether all of
>> them ship it as separate packages already, but the official messaging
>> from us was that they *should*.
> 
> The first Debian upload was:
> 
> qbs (1.2.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>  * Initial release (closes: #745095).
> 
> -- Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57 at gmail.com>  Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:28:44 +0400
> 
> As of today, a little more than 4 years, it has only two users (reverse 
> dependencies): qt creator and dewall.
> 
> Considering yesterday's announce and the fact that qt creator ships a bundled 
> copy the only package stopping us from removing qbs from the archive is 
> dewall, so I don't think it will stay in the archive for much longer.
> 
> 
> -- 
> The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux.
>  Anonymous
> 
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
> http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development