[Development] Build system for Qt 6

[Matthew Woehlke]

On 30/10/2018 14.30, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Painful as [CMake's] syntax is (I've begun reviewing the work for it), it's
> there, someone else is supporting it, and the expected time to the final
> demise of qmake does look shorter than our other options.

FWIW, I don't think anyone is praising CMake's syntax. The problem is
finding a *viable* (and that includes *backwards-compatible*) plan to do
something about it.

If anyone can figure that out, I suspect CMake would be, ah, "highly
receptive" :-).

(I happen to think CMake is *overly* vilified, but I'm not going to
claim it's free of warts, either.)

-- 
Matthew