[Development] Build system for Qt 6
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Tue Oct 30 20:53:48 CET 2018
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 12:29:46 PDT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:01:59PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > The requirement was not of the tool to be packaged.
> >
> > It was of one similar-complexity package *using* the buildsystem to be
> > packaged for 2 years.
>
> err, right.
>
> but quite frankly, i call foul on that one and some other items in your
> list. you had some frustrations as a packager, but that's just part of
> the job, and doesn't authorize you to impose requirements that make it
> basically impossible to employ qt as a bootstrapping device for a qbs
> ecosystem.
The whole point was "let Qt not be the guinea pig". Show me that the tool can
achieve what Qt needs for it to achieve and has enough of a track record of a
community to ask for help. The requirements I outlined were about making that
requirement more objective.
The Qt community can of course disagree with me. The only enforcement I have
is on myself: I said I will not work on Qt if it switches to a different build
system until it meet my requirements. The 2-year-track record is included in
that.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development
mailing list