[Development] Supporting helper functions in auto tests by providing throwing Qt Test macros

Robin Burchell robin.burchell at crimson.no
Wed Apr 3 13:42:17 CEST 2019


On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote:
> I may like the overall approach. However, this would imply that such 
> tests require exceptions / RTTI turned on inside QtTestLib / user code; 
> is it "OK" in the grand scheme of things?

Note that testcase.prf already enables exceptions, at least for Qt's own tests (apparently, according to Mitch, with the exception of testlib's self tests).


More information about the Development mailing list