[Development] HEADS-UP: QStringLiteral
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Wed Aug 21 16:44:51 CEST 2019
On Wednesday, 21 August 2019 00:50:01 PDT Jean-Michaƫl Celerier wrote:
> > Try *any* other compiler and you'll see there's no mutex.
>
> Don't __cxa_guard_acquire / release use at least futexes ? I'd wager that
> in a non-zero amount of applications, having *any* kind of syscalls or
> locks sprinkled here and there
> depending on whether you use "static" or not is not kosher (I'd also wager
> that these applications wouldn't be using Qt anyways... except maybe the
> ones using that safe renderer thing ?).
They do, but my point is that there is no guard acquire or release. The static
in the QStringLiteral lambda is constexpr.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
More information about the Development
mailing list