[Development] Any history on why "qtmultimedia5-private-dev" was removed.
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
perezmeyer at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 21:56:04 CET 2019
Hi again!
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 16:41, Paul Knopf <pauldotknopf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not arguing with that logic.
>
> What that said, what is the Debian policy with regard to what dev packages should be added/removed to the official distro?
>
> From what I'm hearing, I gather it's something like "Debian supports end-user commands/services/applications and the support libraries needed to run them, as well as the dev packages needed to that end."
This is off topic here, but: we strongly support stable API/ABI.
Libraries not shipping stable API/ABI are mostly up to the maintainer.
In this case we ship the minimum necessary parts of private headers.
--
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
More information about the Development
mailing list