[Development] Issues with 'Fixes' keyword

[Simon Hausmann]

I suggest to commit the sources to the qtqa repo.

Simon

> On 18. Jan 2019, at 14:15, Frederik Gladhorn <Frederik.Gladhorn at qt.io> wrote:
> 
>> On torsdag 27. desember 2018 11:05:28 CET Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>>> Am 27.12.2018 um 10:52 schrieb Allan Sandfeld Jensen:
>>> It has been for me. I always put bugs I have a patch in review for "in
>>> progress", and they have been consistently closed, except one time I found
>>> a bug in the script that was then closed. You have probably run into
>>> another bug. What else was special in this case?
>> 
>> I did not saw an obvious difference. Looks like there are others which
>> are not closed in reporting state:
>> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-48505
>> Maybe they're all in dev? At least my last ones for 5.12 were closed
>> automatically.
> 
> I've been side-tracked, so I simply didn't get around to investigating this. 
> Since having only me maintain this is not  a good idea, I'd like to make the 
> sources to the fixes bot available. It's not much code. I'd have done that 
> already, but then I was pondering which repository it should live in. 
> Currently I have the bot in a Qt Company internal repository. It's about 150 
> commits, a few Python files and tests.
> 
> Should this be a new repository on its own? Or would one of the existing repos 
> be sensible?
> 
> Cheers,
> Frederik
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Christian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at qt-project.org
>> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development