[Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

Cristian Adam cristian.adam at qt.io
Tue Jul 2 13:59:29 CEST 2019


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Development <development-bounces at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of
> Frederik Gladhorn
> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11
> To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List <development at qt-project.org>
> Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit
> 2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise for us
> to stay up to date and see if the scripting of the upgrade works.
> The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version
> seems to only compile with one exact Bazel version (roughly).
> 
> So far it seems to work nicely for me, running the script which stops gerrit,
> pushes the new release and restarts it takes around two minutes, so there
> won't be any significant downtime this time around.
> 
> Assuming there are no big concerns I'll just do the upgrade tomorrow, on the
> test instance it works without problems.
> 
> On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit,
> I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add
> reviewers based on git blame https://gerrit-
> review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/reviewers-by-blame
> and I'll give Gravatar a spin:
> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-
> gravatar
> 
> We should also consider the various webhooks plugins. Comments
> appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> Frederik
> 

Hi,

I'm getting from Qt Sanity Bot for https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-creator/qt-creator/+/266791

The following reply every 5 minutes:

**** Worker 'sanity' produced an unreasonable amount of output. You should ask the bot maintainers for advice.

The current behavior is a bit loopy, can we do something about it?

Cheers,
Cristian.


More information about the Development mailing list