[Development] Deprecation/removal model going into Qt 6

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Sun Jun 2 11:43:06 CEST 2019


Il 01/06/19 23:17, Kevin Kofler ha scritto:
> Indeed. One case in point: All this confabulation about move constructors
> etc. misses the point that the gain of moving compared to shallow copying
> with CoW is typically irrelevant for those 95% of non-performance-critical
> code. But using explicit move semantics correctly is significantly harder
> and more prone to misuse than using Qt's implicit CoW.

Please, let's try to stay on topic; bring these considerations to _that_ 
thread.

Thanks,

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190602/6e30761a/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Development mailing list