[Development] Nominating Brett Stottlemeyer for Approver status

[Lars Knoll]

Obvious +1, I thought he had those rights already since a long time.

Cheers,
Lars

On 18 Mar 2019, at 10:07, Simon Hausmann <Simon.Hausmann at qt.io<mailto:Simon.Hausmann at qt.io>> wrote:


+1 to the slam dunk of making Brett approver :). He's great to work with, always positive and I certainly trust him on the approval process.


Simon
________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces at qt-project.org<mailto:development-bounces at qt-project.org>> on behalf of Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at qt.io<mailto:ville.voutilainen at qt.io>>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 9:05
To: development at qt-project.org<mailto:development at qt-project.org>
Subject: [Development] Nominating Brett Stottlemeyer for Approver status

Brett is the maintainer of Qt Remote Objects. Thus he should be
documented as a maintainer, and should also be an approver. Brett has
been effectively maintaining QRO since 2014, so it seems like a slam
dunk to give him the rights.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190318/8a1cb1ab/attachment.html>