[Development] [SPAM] Re: Qt 6: inline namespace Qt

Uwe Rathmann Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de
Fri Sep 6 17:20:15 CEST 2019

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On 9/6/19 4:27 PM, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote: > Yes,
   and no. No, the enums are still defined in namespace Qt. Yes, the > Qt::
  prefix is then optional, so a user name AlignLeft would conflict at > the
  source level, giving a ambiguity error, fixable by explicit > prefixing with
   Qt:: [...] 

Content analysis details:   (4.1 points, 4.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4985]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                            dynamic-looking rDNS
 0.0 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS       Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS
 2.3 FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA     Forged mail pretending to be from Mozilla

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Uwe Rathmann <Uwe.Rathmann at tigertal.de>
Subject: Re: Qt 6: inline namespace Qt
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:20:15 +0200
Size: 1802
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190906/8d6eca66/attachment.mht>

More information about the Development mailing list